From the IPRT: Detention of Children in Ireland: International Standards and Best Practice.

On Monday, the Irish Penal Reform Trust will launch a new report; Detention of Children in Ireland: International Standards and Best Practice. Details of the launch are here. In the year in which the UNCRC turns 20, the IPRT reminds us that:

Article 37 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by Ireland in 1992, requires that the arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child should be a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time. Detention as a last resort requires parsimony in the use of custody for children and that it be limited to exceptional cases, including for example where a child has been found guilty of a violent offence.As long as detention exists as an option, places of detention for children should aim to maximise their chances of rehabilitation and integration into society by providing a humane, safe and secure environment whereby the offending behaviour of children can be addressed, and where children will be assisted to make better choices about their lives during custody and on their return to society.

Herrick on Ireland’s prison policy

The Director of the Irish Penal Reform Trust, Liam Herrick (left), writes in today’s Irish Independent about the implications of the state’s current prison policy and particularly the policy of increasing prison places within the state. The entire column is worth reading and is available here, however the following extract gives a good idea of Liam’s overall argument:

IN Ireland, we know that our prison population is made up in significant part by young people who slip through the cracks of our care system, our education system and our mental health services and who come largely from a small number of extremely poor urban communities where economic policies have failed.

An economic analysis of crime would lead us to investing in those communities and services as the most prudent way to avoiding the long-term costs of an inflated prison system.

We are not so naive as to think that all or even most crime is preventable, but a more sophisticated approach to crime is possible. It’s not a question of being soft on crime, it is a question of being smart and effective in how we respond to crime.

We will always have prisons, but in a society that seeks to prevent social problems and build stronger communities, prison should only be used as a last resort.

Instead, resources should be directed towards early intervention and diversion, alternatives to custody, and ensuring the humane treatment of prisoners where imprisonment is deemed necessary.

This commentary comes hot on the heels of the report of the Inspector of Prisons which Liz Campbell blogged about here. In her post, Liz’s focus was on “Limiting the imposition of prison sentences to grave and violent crimes”, which would “improve the protection of human rights for those who are imprisoned, and…free up resources for alterative measures for non-violent and drug offenders who need not be detained in this way”. In this, both Liz and Liam are of one mind and indeed these sentiments have been echoed throughout the human rights community at home and abroad.

(Photo credit)